Rumble screenshot

Summary List Placement

Video-sharing site Rumble has accused Google of “unfairly rigging its search algorithm” to favor YouTube’s videos in search results, marking the tech giant’s latest in a series of antitrust headaches. 

Rumble, based in Toronto, filed a lawsuit in California on Monday claiming that Google’s actions, including unfair search algorithms and the pre-installation of the YouTube app on Android devices, had cost it viewers and advertising revenue. 

The complaint reads: “Google, through its search engine, was able to wrongfully divert massive traffic to YouTube, depriving Rumble of the additional traffic, users, uploads, brand awareness and revenue it would have otherwise received.”

Google has faced a string of antitrust actions over its search dominance the past few years, drawing attention from US authorities, EU legislators, and market competitors alike. 

Rumble has become popular with conservatives in the past year or so, encouraged by Republican congressman Devin Nunes and other conservative figures. The company says it has more than 2 million creators using the site.

Influential right-wingers in the US have taken an aggressive stance against established US tech firms such as Facebook, Google, Apple, and Amazon, a position lately intensified by the platforms teaming up to essentially block right-wing social messaging platform Parler.

Currently Rumble’s list of most-watched videos include conservative political commentator Dan Bongino, Fox presenter Sean Hannity, and conservative YouTubers Diamond and Silk. Its CEO, Chris Pavlovski, regularly posts updates on Twitter about right-wing figures joining the platform.

In its complaint, Rumble accuses Google “willfully and unlawfully created and maintained a monopoly in the online video-sharing platform market in at least two ways.”

  Moon urges Biden to learn from Trump's N. Korea diplomacy

It adds: “First, by manipulating the algorithms by which searched-for-video results are listed, Google insures that the videos on YouTube are listed first, and that those of its competitors…are listed way down the list…

“Second, by pre-installation of the YouTube app as the default online video-sharing app on Google smart phones, and by entering into anti-competitive, illegal tying agreements with other smartphone manufacturers to do the same.” 

The firm indicated it was seeking damages of at least $2 billion.

Rumble’s complaint comes shortly after Parler sued Amazon, and marks a potentially troubling new antitrust for the major platforms. Amazon had hosted Parler’s service on its cloud service AWS, but booted the firm off after the US Capitol riots last week. Parler claimed in its subsequent suit that Amazon was behaving anti-competitively. Parler’s lawsuit indicates that sites and apps banned or penalized by the US tech giants for hate or violent speech are willing to use the emerging antitrust sentiment in court.

A Google spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal: “We will defend ourselves against these baseless claims.” 

Business Insider approached Rumble and Google for further comment. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A top economist explains how weighted voting could change democracy

…read more

Source:: Business Insider


(Visited 7 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *