Boris Johnson’s big Brexit speech was high on rhetoric and short on answers
Remainers aren’t worried about John Stuart Mill – they’re worried about policy.
Boris Johnson and I don’t have much in common but we do share a university, albeit one we attended several decades apart. Listening to his big Brexit address at Policy Exchange I found myself gripped by unwanted flashbacks to my time there and the speeches one would occasionally have to endure in tutorial when someone – usually but not exclusively someone from a famous private school like Johnson’s – hadn’t done the reading but they did have a big argument they knew could get them through the hour.
Similarly, Johnson’s speech hung together as far as the essay question he had set himself – “Is Brexit a great liberal cause?”- went but unfortunately it fell apart as far as the actual thing the government needs to solve which is “What did Remainers fear to lose in the referendum, and how can they be reassured?”
The problem is that most Remainers didn’t vote to stay in the European Union because of a high-minded commitment to the institutions of the EU or an ideological sense that it was better for liberalism, or conservativism, or social democracy or socialism or whatever creed you care to name. Those that did are beyond the reach of Johnson or the government anyway. Most Remainers voted to stay in the EU because of concern about what leaving would look like, and the disruption it might cause, and it was on that subject that the speech was thinnest.
Where it did succeed in offering reassurance was in the passages where Johnson effectively pledged that nothing would change, i.e. security and foreign affairs, where the British government hopes it will effectively remain in the EU as far as its role in those areas are concerned. (The same is …read more
Source:: New Statesman